The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
Abstract 1. 1. This paper describes various experiments on the integration of reproductive physiology and behaviour in female Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. 2. 2. The sexual behaviour of females is ascribed to two distinct processes. One determines the state of receptivity, i.e. whether a female is ‘accessible’ to stimulation from the courtship of a male, the other summates the various stimuli from courtship and eventually leads to the female accepting a male. 3. 3. Females are unreceptive to males on the day of eclosion (day 0) about 25 per cent are receptive on day 1, the rest by day 2. More precise tests place the transition period between 24 and 40 hr from eclosion. In any individual the change is a sudden one; females are either fully receptive or fully unreceptive. Accordingly this change is called ‘switch-on’. 4. 4. The corpus allatum and ovaries show a growth cycle parallel to that of receptivity. Evidence is presented that increase in juvenile hormone titre is responsible for the ‘switch-on’ of receptivity. 5. 5. Virgin females remain receptive for many days, but an increasing proportion become unreceptive after the first week of adult life. ‘Switch-off’ like ‘switch-on’ is a rapid, all-or-nothing process. Females also become unreceptive immediately after mating and this inhibition of receptivity has two components, (a) an effect of copulation itself, probably mechanical, which wears off after 48 hr, (b) an effect due to the presence of live sperm, which wears off once a female has exhausted the sperm by egg laying, after some 8 to 10 days. 6. 6. Old females which have mated and used up their sperm are more often receptive than virgins of the same age. It is suggested that this is so because their corpora allata are more active and the juvenile hormone concentration is kept up above the critical level for longer. 7. 7. The situation revealed in Drosophila is compared with that found in other insects, particularly with regard to the role of the endocrine system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS
PARKER, G. A. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x · Cited by 3,596
Hall, J. C. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8209251 · Cited by 668
A few chemical words exchanged byDrosophila during courtship and mating
Jallon, J.-M. (1984) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01065444 · Cited by 455
Wired for Sex: The Neurobiology of Drosophila Mating Decisions
Dickson, B. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159276 · Cited by 314
Herndon, L. A., & Wolfner, M. F. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.22.10114 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, A.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1967-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 239-250
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980932518
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0003-3472(67)90006-1
- The paper
- Manning, A. (1967). The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. Animal Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(67)90006-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.