Competitive orders as measures of social dominance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social rank can influence access to essential resources including food, territory, and mates.
“Social rank can influence access to essential resources including food, territory, and mates205, and thus a more dominant rank is often a coveted position associated with higher quality of life.”
From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [205]
Dominants might win spontaneous fights but have no obvious advantage in competing for rewards, or might have advantage regarding only some kinds of resources.
“For example, dominants might win spontaneous fights but have no obvious advantage in competing for rewards, or might have advantage regarding only some kinds of resources.99,100”
From Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice (2019) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 223
- Authors
- Syme, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Canterbury (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Syme, G.J.
- Venue
- Animal Behaviour
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1974-11
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 931-940
- ISSN
- 0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072510885
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University Grants Committee
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- competitive order, social dominance, response requirement, internal validity, generalizability, animal social behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
