CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 677

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity

Plebanski, J.F, Demianski, M·1976·Annals of Physics
DOI 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90240-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90240-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To be static, the brane intersects the black hole orthogonally, otherwise the black hole would grow by eating the brane.

    “To be static, the brane intersects the black hole orthogonally, otherwise the black hole would grow by eating the brane.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [89]

  • A static black hole stuck to the brane will neither eat the brane nor slide off it.

    “Next, a static black hole stuck to the brane will neither eat the brane or slide off it.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [89]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Tomimatsu, 1972, Phys. Rev. Lett., 29, 1344, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.1344 · DOI
  2. Levi-Civita, 1918, Atti Accel. dei-Lincei, Rendiconti., 27, 343
  3. Newman, 1961, J. Math. Phys., 2, 667, 10.1063/1.1703754 · DOI
  4. I. Robinson and A. Trautman, Proc. Roy. Soc. LondonA265 (1962), 463. · DOI
  5. Kinnersley, 1970, Phys. Rev., D2, 1359
  6. Kerr, 1963, Phys. Rev. Lett., 11, 237, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237 · DOI
  7. Newman, 1965, J. Math. Phys., 6, 918, 10.1063/1.1704351 · DOI
  8. Carter, 1968, Comm. Math. Phys., 10, 280, 10.1007/BF03399503 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Demianski, 1966, Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. Ser. Math. Phys., 14, 653
  10. Kinnersley, 1969, J. Math. Phys., 10, 1195, 10.1063/1.1664958 · DOI
  11. Demianski, 1973, Acta Astronom., 23, 197
  12. Demianski, 1972, Phys. Lett., 42A, 157, 10.1016/0375-9601(72)90752-9 · DOI
  13. Kottler, 1918, Ann. Physik., 4, 56
  14. Reisner, 1916, Ann. Phys. Leipsiz, 50, 106, 10.1002/andp.19163550905 · DOI
  15. Newman, 1963, J. Math. Phys., 4, 915, 10.1063/1.1704018 · DOI
  16. Schwarzschild, 1916, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 7, 189
  17. Taub, 1951, Ann. Math., 53, 472, 10.2307/1969567 · DOI
  18. Brill, 1964, Phys. Rev., 133, 845, 10.1103/PhysRev.133.B845 · DOI
  19. Kramer, 1968, Comm. Math. Phys., 10, 132, 10.1007/BF01654237 · DOI
  20. Perjes, 1969, Comm. Math. Phys., 12, 275, 10.1007/BF01667313 · DOI
  21. Ernst, 1968, Phys. Rev., 168, 1415, 10.1103/PhysRev.168.1415 · DOI
  22. Robinson, 1969, J. Math. Mech., 18, 881
  23. Bertotti, 1959, Phys. Rev., 116, 1331, 10.1103/PhysRev.116.1331 · DOI
  24. Robinson, 1959, Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. Ser. Math. Phys., 7, 351
  25. de Sitter, 1917, Mon. Nat. Roy. Astro. Soc., 78, 3, 10.1093/mnras/78.1.3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Plebanski, J. F., & Demianski, M.
Venue
Annals of Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1976-05
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
98-127
ISSN
0003-4916
DOI
10.1016/0003-4916(76)90240-2
Cited by
677
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review