Cited by 1,707Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

Stability in gauged extended supergravity

Breitenlohner, Peter, Freedman, Daniel Z·1982·Annals of Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In AdS2 vacua, some amount of tachyonic mass is not in contradiction with the stability condition, known as the BF bound.

    “Notice that, in the case of AdS 2 vacua, some amount of tachyonic mass is not in contradiction with the stability condition, known as BF bound [48,49].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breitenlohner, P., & Freedman, D. Z.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Annals of Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-12
Volume
144
Issue
2
Pages
249-281
ISSN
0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989132853
Cited by
1,707
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 77
FWCI
22.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
boundary conditions, Cauchy problem, spin-0 fields, quantum field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review