CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Enzymatic defluorination of fluoroacetate in mouse liver cytosol: The separation of defluorination activity from several glutathione S-transferases of mouse liver

Soiefer, Andrew I., Kostyniak, Paul J.·1983·Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
DOI 10.1016/0003-9861(83)90107-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The liberation of free fluoride ion from fluoroacetate (FAc) proceeds as an enzyme-catalyzed dehalogenation reaction in the soluble fractions of several organs of the CFW Swiss mouse. Liver contained the highest FAc defluorinating activity. The enzyme activity in other organs decreased in the order kidney greater than lung greater than heart greater than testes. No activity was detected in the brain. Experiments were designed to characterize and identify the enzyme species responsible for FAc metabolism in liver. Enzyme activity was dependent on the concentration of glutathione (GSH) in the assay mixture, with maximal activity occurring above 5 mM. The dehalogenation of FAc had an apparent Km of 7.0 mM when measured in the presence of a saturating concentration of GSH. An increase in the pH of the assay mixture enhanced fluoride release in both phosphate and borate buffer. The defluorination activity was reduced to negligible levels when stored for 24 h at 4 degrees C. The addition of either GSH, dithiothreitol, or 2-mercaptoethanol increased stability, with the latter providing protection for greater than 150 h at a concentration of 15 mM. DEAE anion-exchange chromatography separated the defluorinating activity from 90% of the soluble GSH S-transferase activity measured with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene. FAc defluorination activity did not bind to a GSH affinity column which selectively separates it from a group of anionic GSH S-transferases. The GSH-dependent enzyme which de…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0003-9861(83)90107-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Peters, 1952, 139, 143
  2. Gal, 1961, Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 93, 1, 10.1016/0003-9861(61)90308-3 · DOI
  3. Mead, 1979, Aust. J. Biol. Sci, 32, 15, 10.1071/BI9790015 · DOI
  4. Oliver, 1977, Search, 8, 130
  5. King, 1978, Aust. J. Zool, 26, 699, 10.1071/ZO9780699 · DOI
  6. Kostyniak, 1978, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol, 44, 89, 10.1016/0041-008X(78)90287-9 · DOI
  7. Kostyniak, 1979, Toxicol. Lett, 3, 225, 10.1016/0378-4274(79)90038-9 · DOI
  8. Cowell, 1975, Med. Lab. Tech, 32, 73
  9. Goldman, 1965, J. Biol. Chem, 240, 3434, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)97236-4 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Habig, 1974, J. Biol. Chem, 249, 7130, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42083-8 · DOI
  11. Simons, 1977, Anal. Biochem, 82, 334, 10.1016/0003-2697(77)90169-5 · DOI
  12. Böhlen, 1973, Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 155, 213, 10.1016/S0003-9861(73)80023-2 · DOI
  13. Lee, 1981, J. Biol. Chem, 256, 8110, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)43395-9 · DOI
  14. Hales, 1978, Biochem. J, 175, 937, 10.1042/bj1750937 · DOI
  15. Kamisaka, 1975, Eur. J. Biochem, 60, 153, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb20987.x · DOI
  16. Das, 1981, J. Neurochem, 36, 1439, 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb00584.x · DOI
  17. Guthenberg, 1979, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 86, 1304, 10.1016/0006-291X(79)90258-4 · DOI
  18. Dierickx, 1981, Biochem. Int, 3, 565
  19. Chasseaud, 1979, Advan. Cancer Res, 29, 175, 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60848-9 · DOI
  20. Chenoweth, 1949, Pharmacol. Rev, 1, 383
  21. Sullivan, 1979, J. Reprod. Fert, 56, 201, 10.1530/jrf.0.0560201 · DOI
  22. Koskelo, 1981, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest, 41, 683, 10.3109/00365518109090515 · DOI
  23. Marcus, 1978, Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 188, 287, 10.1016/S0003-9861(78)80011-3 · DOI
  24. Awasthi, 1980, Biochem. J, 191, 1, 10.1042/bj1910001 · DOI
  25. Saneto, 1980, Biochem. J, 191, 11, 10.1042/bj1910011 · DOI
  26. Warholm, 1981, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 98, 512, 10.1016/0006-291X(81)90870-6 · DOI
  27. Polidoro, 1981, Biochem. Med, 25, 247, 10.1016/0006-2944(81)90082-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Soiefer, A. I., & Kostyniak, P. J.
Venue
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-09
Volume
225
Issue
2
Pages
928-935
ISSN
0003-9861
DOI
10.1016/0003-9861(83)90107-8
Cited by
23
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review