Cited by 65Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysAutophagy in Disease and TherapyConnexins and lens biology

Aging and cellular maturation cause changes in ubiquitin-eye lens protein conjugates

Jahngen, Jessica H., Lipman, Ruth D., Eisenhauer, Donald A., Jahngen, Edwin G.E., Taylor, Allen·1990·Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Abstract

The eye lens is a useful tissue for studying phenomena related to aging since it can be separated into differentially aged or matured zones. This work establishes correlations between ubiquitin-lens protein conjugating capabilities and age, as well as the stage of maturation of bovine lens tissue. When exogenous 125I-ubiquitin was combined with supernatants of epithelial (least mature), cortex, and core (most mature) tissue, ATP-dependent conjugation of 125I-ubiquitin to lens proteins was most effective with the epithelial tissue preparation. Conjugate formation was greatest when lenses were obtained from young animals. Supernatants from cultured bovine lens epithelial (BLE) cells conjugated more 125I-ubiquitin to lens proteins than any tissue preparation. In all cases the predominant conjugates formed in these cell-free assays were of high molecular mass, although conjugates with masses in the 25-70 kDa range were also observed. Lens tissue and cultured BLE cell preparations were also probed with antibodies to ubiquitin to detect in vivo ubiquitin-lens protein conjugates. There was more free ubiquitin and ubiquitin conjugates in tissue from young as compared with older lenses. The greatest levels of conjugates were observed in cultured BLE cells. Specificity in the ubiquitination system is indicated since some of the conjugates formed in vivo appear identical to those formed in the cell-free assays and in reticulocytes using exogenous 125I-ubiquitin. Upon development and maturation of lens tissue (i.e., core as opposed to epithelium), there is accumulation of lower molecular mass conjugates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0003-9861(90)90006-k

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jahngen, J. H., Lipman, R. D., Eisenhauer, D. A., Jahngen, E. G. E., & Taylor, A.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Allen
Venue
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-01
Volume
276
Issue
1
Pages
32-37
ISSN
0003-9861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076696727
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Foundation
  • Massachusetts Lions Eye Research Fund
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Oogfonds
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (EY05966-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
Keywords
ubiquitination, reticulocytes
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Aging, Animals, Cattle, Cells, Cultured, Crystallins, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Epithelium, Lens, Crystalline, Molecular Weight, Protein Binding, Ubiquitins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review