Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computations underlying the measurement of visual motion

Hildreth, Ellen C.·1984·Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Abstract The organization of movement in a changing image provides a valuable source of information for analyzing the environment in terms of objects, their motion in space, and their three-dimensional structure. A description of this movement is not provided to our visual system directly, however; it must be inferred from the pattern of changing intensity that reaches the eye. This paper examines the problem of motion measurement, which we formulate as the computation of an instantaneous two-dimensional velocity field. Initial motion measurements occur at the location of significant intensity changes, as suggested by Marr and Ullman [1]. These measurements provide only one component of velocity, and must be integrated to compute the two-dimensional velocity field. A fundamental problem for this integration is that motion is not determined uniquely from the changing image. An additional constraint of smoothness of the velocity field is formulated, based on the physical assumption that surfaces are generally smooth, allowing the computation of a unique solution. A theoretical analysis of the conditions under which this computation yields the correct velocity field suggests that the solution is physically plausible; empirical studies show the results to be consistent with human motion perception.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0004-3702(84)90018-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hildreth, E. C.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-08
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
309-354
ISSN
0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W112287601
Cited by
303
References
1
FWCI
14.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.