The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attributive concept descriptions with complements
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1979) · Cited by 43,841
The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations
Baltin, M., & Bresnan, J. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/414493 · Cited by 2,783
An overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System
BRACHMAN, R., & SCHMOLZE, J. (1985) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(85)80014-8 · Cited by 1,772
Information-based syntax and semantics
Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,072
Readings in Knowledge Representation
Brachman, R. J., & Levesque, H. J. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,041
An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar
Shieber, S. M. (1986) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 935
CLASSIC: a structural data model for objects
Borgida, A. T., Brachman, R. J., McGuinness, D. L., & Resnick, L. A. (1989) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/66926.66932 · Cited by 499
The tractability of subsumption in frame-based description languages
Brachman, R. J., & Levesque, H. J. (1984) · Cited by 334
Expressiveness and tractability in knowledge representation and reasoning1
Levesque, H. J., & Brachman, R. J. (1987) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1987.tb00176.x · Cited by 320
A logical semantics for feature structures
Kasper, R. T., & Rounds, W. C. (1986) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · doi:10.3115/981131.981166 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Hogan, A., Blomqvist, E., Cochez, M., D’amato, C., Melo, G. D., Gutierrez, C., Kirrane, S., Gayo, J. E. L., Navigli, R., Neumaier, S., et al. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3447772 · Cited by 1,904
Practical Reasoning for Expressive Description Logics
Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., & Tobies, S. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48242-3_11 · Cited by 532
Managing uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the Semantic Web
Lukasiewicz, T., & Straccia, U. (2008) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2008.04.001 · Cited by 473
Larks: Dynamic Matchmaking Among Heterogeneous Software Agents in Cyberspace
Sycara, K., Widoff, S., Klusch, M., & Lu, J. (2002) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1014897210525 · Cited by 454
Navigating the Affordance Landscape: Feedback Control as a Process Model of Behavior and Cognition
Pezzulo, G., & Cisek, P. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt-Schauß, M., & Smolka, G.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145465694
- Cited by
- 962
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 24.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attributive concept descriptions with complements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0004-3702(91)90078-x
- The paper
- Schmidt-Schauß, M., & Smolka, G. (1991). Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(91)90078-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
