The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Approximating probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks is NP-hard
Open accessAbstract
It is known that exact computation of conditional probabilities in belief networks is NP-hard. Many investigators in the AI community have tacitly assumed that algorithms for performing approximate inference with belief networks are of polynomial complexity. Indeed, special cases of approximate inference can be performed in time polynomial in the input size. However, we have discovered that the general problem of approximating conditional probabilities with belief networks, like exact inference, resides in the NP-hard complexity class. We develop a complexity analysis to elucidate the difficulty of approximate probabilistic inference. More specifically, we show that the existence of a polynomial-time relative approximation algorithm for major classes of problem instances implies that NP ⊆ P. We present our proof and explore the implications of the result.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Introduction to Variational Methods for Graphical Models
Jordan, M. I., Ghahramani, Z., Jaakkola, T. S., & Saul, L. K. (1999) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007665907178 · Cited by 3,791
Bayesian intractability is not an ailment that approximation can cure
Kwisthout, J., Wareham, T., & van Rooij, I. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01182.x · Cited by 122
Bayesian networks for interpretable machine learning and optimization
Mihaljević, B., Bielza, C., & Larrañaga, P. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.01.138 · Cited by 123
Quantum inference on Bayesian networks
Low, G. H., Yoder, T. J., & Chuang, I. L. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.062315 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Dagum, P., & Luby, M.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-153
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999432334
- Cited by
- 761
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Approximating probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks is NP-hard. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0004-3702(93)90036-b
- The paper
- Dagum, P., & Luby, M. (1993). Approximating probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks is NP-hard. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(93)90036-b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.