Cited by 355Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesStress Responses and Cortisol

Individual differences in the selective processing of threatening information, and emotional responses to a stressful life event

MacLeod, Colin, Hagan, Rosemary·1992·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Previous research has established that high levels of trait anxiety commonly are associated with an automatic pattern of encoding selectivity, operating to favour the processing of emotionally threatening information. It has been suggested that this processing bias may play a functional role in mediating emotional vulnerability by moderating affective responses to stressful real life events. The current experiment employs a longitudinal design, capable of addressing the central predictions arising from this theoretical position. Thirty-one women awaiting colposcopy investigation were screened on both traditional questionnaire measures of emotional vulnerability, and on a modified emotional Stroop task that provided objective indices of their automatic and strategic patterns of processing selectivity. Subsequently, those 15 women who later received a diagnosis of cervical pathology reported the degree to which this diagnosis had impaired their level of emotional functioning. The results confirm that, at the initial test time, trait anxiety was indeed associated with an apparently automatic tendency to selectively process threat related distractor information. Furthermore, an index of this initial pattern of automatic processing selectivity was consistently the best predictor of the intensity of emotional distress elicited by the subsequent diagnosis of cervical pathology. None of our conventional questionnaire measures were capable of significantly predicting this later emotio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7967(92)90138-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 355

Authors
MacLeod, C., & Hagan, R.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-03
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
151-161
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972553927
Cited by
355
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
trait anxiety, emotional vulnerability, emotional Stroop task, emotional distress, life events, cervical pathology, colposcopy, emotional functioning, women
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Arousal, Colposcopy, Female, Humans, Individuality, Life Change Events, Middle Aged, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review