The hoarding of possessions
Abstract
Three studies of nonfood hoarding are reported. Findings support the reliability and validity of a Hoarding Scale. Furthermore, the findings indicate a number of features of hoarding behavior. Hoarding was associated with indecisiveness, perfectionism (especially maladaptive evaluative concern) and obsessive compulsive symptoms among college students and community volunteers. Hoarders tended to buy extra things in order not to be caught without a needed item, and they carried more 'just-in-case' items in purses, pockets and cars. Onset of hoarding was childhood and adolescence. Hoarders had more first degree relatives who engaged in excessive saving than nonhoarders, and hoarders were less likely to be married. There was no evidence to suggest that hoarding was related to material deprivation. A model was suggested which conceptualizes hoarding as an avoidance behavior tied to indecisiveness and perfectionism. Saving allows the hoarder to avoid the decision required to throw something away, and the worry which accompanies that decision (worry that a mistake has been made). Also, it allows hoarders to avoid emotional reactions which accompany parting with cherished possessions, and results in increased perception of control.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hoarding is thought to have an evolutionary basis in that it should prevent individuals from being caught unprepared.
“Hoarding is thought to have an evolutionary basis in that it should prevent individuals from being caught unprepared (Frost and Gross, 1993).”
From Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Frost and Gross, 1993
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 33 · Cited by 605
- Authors
- Frost, R. O., & Gross, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Smith College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Frost, Randy O.
- ORCID
- Frost, Randy O.
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 367-381
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979211264
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Keywords
- hoarding, indecision, perfectionism, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, avoidance behavior, family history (medicine), material deprivation, perceived control, university students, community volunteers
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Compulsive Behavior, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Obsessive Behavior, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Rationalization, Self Concept
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review