CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 255Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of pain in patients with chronic low back pain: Effects of inaccurate prediction and pain-related anxiety

McCracken, Lance M., Gross, Richard T., Sorg, P.J., Edmands, Theresa A.·1993·Behaviour Research and Therapy
DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90117-d
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated predictions of pain intensity, reports of pain and anxiety, frequency of pain-related anxiety symptoms, and range of motion, in 43 patients exposed to pain during a physical examination. All patients had primary complaints of low back pain. The pain stimuli used for this study included back and/or leg pain produced by repeatedly raising the extended leg of the patient to the point of pain tolerance. Generally, findings demonstrated that (a) predictions of pain were a function of discrepancies between previous predictions and experiences of pain, (b) patients reporting greater pain-related anxiety showed a tendency to overpredict new pain events, but corrected their predictions readily, (c) patients reporting less pain-related anxiety displayed a persistent tendency to underpredict pain, and (d) higher predictions of pain, independent of pain reports, related to less range of motion during a procedure that involved painful movement. Discussion focuses on differences between these results and those of previous studies and the implications of inaccurate prediction for continued pain and disability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90117-d

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McCracken, 1993, The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS): a multimodal measure of pain specific anxiety symptoms, The Behavior Therapist

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–255 of 255

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
McCracken, L. M., Gross, R. T., Sorg, P. J., & Edmands, T. A.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
McCracken, Lance M.
ORCID
McCracken, Lance M.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-09
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
647-652
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0005-7967(93)90117-d
OpenAlex
W1995992378
Cited by
254
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic low back pain, pain prediction, pain-related anxiety, range of motion, pain tolerance, disability
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Patient Care Team, Sick Role, Range of Motion, Articular, Low Back Pain, Pain Threshold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review