Social phobia and social appraisal in successful and unsuccessful social interactions
Abstract
32 generalized social phobic outpatients and 32 matched nonclinical control subjects participated in a dyadic 'getting acquainted' interaction with an experimental assistant who engaged in either positive or negative social behavior. The accuracy of social phobics' and control subjects' perceptions of themselves and their partners were compared in the two conditions. Relative to observers' ratings, the social phobics displayed a negative bias in their appraisals of some, but not all, aspects of their social performance. These results suggested that social phobics may have particular difficulty gauging the nonverbal aspects of their social behavior. The phobics discounted their social competence to the same extent in the positive interaction, where their behavior was more skillful, as in the negative interaction. The social phobics were also less accurate than nonclinical controls in their appraisals of their partners, however, these phobic subjects displayed a positive bias when appraising their partner's performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People with SAD often react to positive feedback by expecting that their partner will expect more from them in the next interaction and that they will fall short of those expectations.
“For example, people with SAD often react to positive feedback by expecting that their partner will expect more from them in the next interaction and that they will fall short of those expectations (38, 39).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 336
- Authors
- Alden, L. E., & Wallace, S. T.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- ORCID
- Alden, Lynn E.
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 497-505
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007217193
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- social anxiety disorder, social evaluation, self-perception, social competence, dyadic interaction, nonverbal behavior, social performance, self-assessment bias
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personality Assessment, Phobic Disorders, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review