Cited by 336Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Social phobia and social appraisal in successful and unsuccessful social interactions

Alden, Lynn E., Wallace, Scott T.·1995·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

32 generalized social phobic outpatients and 32 matched nonclinical control subjects participated in a dyadic 'getting acquainted' interaction with an experimental assistant who engaged in either positive or negative social behavior. The accuracy of social phobics' and control subjects' perceptions of themselves and their partners were compared in the two conditions. Relative to observers' ratings, the social phobics displayed a negative bias in their appraisals of some, but not all, aspects of their social performance. These results suggested that social phobics may have particular difficulty gauging the nonverbal aspects of their social behavior. The phobics discounted their social competence to the same extent in the positive interaction, where their behavior was more skillful, as in the negative interaction. The social phobics were also less accurate than nonclinical controls in their appraisals of their partners, however, these phobic subjects displayed a positive bias when appraising their partner's performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00088-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 336

Authors
Alden, L. E., & Wallace, S. T.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
497-505
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007217193
Cited by
336
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, social evaluation, self-perception, social competence, dyadic interaction, nonverbal behavior, social performance, self-assessment bias
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personality Assessment, Phobic Disorders, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review