Fear-potentiated startle in posttraumatic stress disorder
Abstract
Exaggerated startle is reputed to be one of the cardinal symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); however, objective studies have given conflicting results as to whether or not startle is increased in PTSD. The present study investigated startle in PTSD during the threat of shock (fear-potentiated startle). The eyeblink component of the startle reflex was measured at various times preceding and following the anticipation of unpleasant electric shocks in 9 PTSD subjects and 10 age-matched, healthy controls. Startle amplitude was significantly greater during baseline and during shock anticipation in the PTSD subjects, compared to the controls. Habituation of the startle reflex was normal. Because other studies in the literature, as well as in our own laboratory, have failed to find exaggerated startle at baseline (i.e., absence of stress) in PTSD patients, it is unlikely that the present results reflect a chronic elevation of startle in this group. Instead, the higher levels of startle in the PTSD group probably resulted from a greater conditioned emotional response in this group, triggered by anticipation of electric shocks that generalized to the unfamiliar experimental context in which testing occurred. Hence, emotionally charged test procedures may be especially informative in distinguishing PTSD patients from other psychiatric diagnostic groups.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar results have been reported in PTSD.
“Similar results have been reported in PTSD (Grillon et al, 1996; Morgan et al, 1995a, b).”
From Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Morgan et al, 1995a, b
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 242
- Authors
- Morgan, C. A., Grillon, C., Southwick, S. M., Davis, M., & Charney, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 378-385
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089937996
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh040140-08, 5r29mh050720-05)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1 R29 MH-50720, MH 47840, R01-MH40140)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, fear-potentiated startle, startle response, habituation, conditioned emotional response, electric shock
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety, Blinking, Electroshock, Fear, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Male, Reflex, Startle, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Panic Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review