Bipolar disorders, dystonia, and compulsion after dysfunction of the cerebellum, dentatorubrothalamic tract, and substantia nigra
Abstract
Bipolar disorders occurred in 3 of 15 (20%) subjects after focal cerebellar circuit lesions. Two presented with rapid cycling bipolar disorder and dystonia, including one with a checking compulsion. Lesions included right cerebellar hypoplasia (bipolar disorder), bilateral cerebellar atrophy (rapid cycling unipolar mania and dystonia), and left midbrain pathology (mixed bipolar disorder, dystonia, and compulsion). Bipolar disorders were associated with cerebellar circuit pathology (p = 0.032) and were more prevalent than in population controls (p = 0.004). Diminished cerebellar output (to cortical, thalamic, basal ganglia, limbic, or other circuits) or nigral pars reticulata dysfunction may result in abnormal neuronal oscillation in bipolar disorders, especially rapid-cycling types, or in dystonia. Review of the literature supports the concept of nigral and cerebellar direct and indirect connections with thalamofrontotemporal and basal ganglia circuits in bipolar disorders, dystonia, and compulsions, as well as possible clinical relationships between these disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cerebellar lesions and peri-cerebellar cysts are associated with a higher risk of bipolar disorder symptom presentation.
“Additionally, cerebellar lesions and peri-cerebellar cysts have been associated with a higher risk of bipolar disorder symptom presentation (Ewald et al., 2022; Lauterbach, 1996).”
From A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial of cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation for bipolar disorder: Safety, tolerability, mood and cognitive effects (2025) · cites this paper as Lauterbach, 1996
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 70 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Lauterbach, E. C.
- Affiliations
- Mercer University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lauterbach, Edward C.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 726-730
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036115271
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Keywords
- bipolar disorder, rapid cycling bipolar disorder, dystonia, checking compulsions, cerebellar lesions, cerebellar hypoplasia, cerebellar atrophy, substantia nigra, basal ganglia circuitry, neural oscillations, focal brain lesions
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Brain Mapping, Cerebellar Nuclei, Cerebellum, Dystonia, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Red Nucleus, Substantia Nigra, Thalamic Nuclei, Neurocognitive Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review