Cited by 33Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Postsynaptic responses of hippocampal neurons to mesencephalic stimulation: Depolarizing potentials and discharge patterns

Grantyn, Rosemarie, Grantyn, Alexej A.·1973·Brain Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90766-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grantyn, R., & Grantyn, A. A.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1973-04
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
55-69
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000902457
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
hippocampal neurons, excitatory postsynaptic potentials, apical dendrites, prepotential
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Hippocampus, Mesencephalon, Microelectrodes, Microscopy, Polarization, Neuromuscular Depolarizing Agents, Neurons, Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review