Diversity of regional sympathetic outflow in integrative cardiovascular control: Patterns and mechanisms
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regional sympathetic responses can be highly differentiated.
“However, regional sympathetic responses can be highly differentiated (47)”
From Differential effects of hyperinsulinemia and carbohydrate metabolism on sympathetic nerve activity and muscle blood flow in humans (1993) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- Simon, E., & Riedel, W.
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-04
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 323-333
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972111764
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- sympathetic nervous system, cardiovascular regulation, regional blood flow, autonomic regulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Aorta, Blood Pressure, Carotid Sinus, Cold Temperature, Denervation, Dogs, Ear, External, Heart Rate, Hot Temperature, Hypercapnia, Intestines, Pressoreceptors, Rabbits, Reflex, Skin, Skin Temperature, Spinal Cord, Vagotomy, Vasomotor System
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
