Cited by 130Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Mecencephalic dopaminergic afferents to the lateral septal nucleus of the rat

Lindvall, Olle·1975·Brain Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90785-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 130

Authors
Lindvall, O.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lindvall, Olle
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1975-04
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
89-95
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987414274
Cited by
130
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
lateral septal nucleus, dopaminergic afferents, midbrain dopamine, reward, motivation, anxiety, hippocampus, place cells, affective pathways, decision-making
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Dopamine, Female, Mesencephalon, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Neurons, Afferent, Septal Nuclei, Septum Pellucidum, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review