Cited by 193Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Neurophysiological analysis of brain-stimulation reward in the monkey

Rolls, E.T., Burton, M.J., Mora, F.·1980·Brain Research

Abstract

Neuronal activity related to brain-stimulation reward and to feeding was analyzed in rhesus monkeys and squirrel monkeys as follows. First, self-stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala and nucleus accumbens was found. Second, a population of single neurones in the lateral hypothalamus was found to be trans-synaptically activated from one or several self-stimulation sites. It was also found to populations of neurones in the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala were activated from at least some of the self-stimulation sites. Thus, in the monkey, there is evidence for an interconnected set of self-stimulation sites, stimulation in any one of which may activate neurones in the other regions. These sites include the lateral hypothalamus, amygdala, and orbitofrontal cortex. Third, in one sample of 764 neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata which were activated from brain-stimulation reward sites, 13.6% were also activated during feeding, by the sight and/or taste of food. The responses of the neurones with activity associated with taste occurred only while some substances (e.g. sweet substances such as glucose) were in the mouth, depended on the concentration of the substances being tasted, and were independent of mouth movements made by the monkeys. Fourth, the responses of these neurones occurred to food when the monkeys were hungry, but not when they were satiated. Fifth, self-stimulation occurred in the region of these neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata, and was attenuated by satiety. These results suggest that self-stimulation of some brain sites occurs because of activation of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata activated by the sight and/or taste of food in the hungry animal, and that these neurones are involved in responses to food reward.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91216-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Engagement of reward circuitry in social deficit may enhance the rewarding value of social contact, similar to how food deprivation enhances the rewarding properties of food.

    “Engagement of reward circuitry in situations of social deficit may enhance the rewarding value of social contact—potentially similar to how food deprivation enhances the rewarding properties of food219–222.”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [222]

  • The macaque orbitofrontal cortex is a key brain site at which deep brain electrical stimulation is rewarding.

    “The macaque OFC is a key brain site at which deep brain electrical stimulation is rewarding (Rolls et al., 1980; Rolls, 2005, 2019c).”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Rolls et al., 1980

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 193

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Plotnik, 1972, Map of reinforcing sites in the rhesus monkey brain, Int. J. Psychobiol., 2, 1
  2. Rolls, 1976, Neurophysiology of feeding, Life Sci. Res. Rep. 2, 21

Metadata

Authors
Rolls, E. T., Burton, M. J., & Mora, F.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-08
Volume
194
Issue
2
Pages
339-357
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998445654
Cited by
193
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
brain stimulation reward, self-stimulation, lateral hypothalamus, substantia innominata, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, feeding behavior, taste response, satiety, hunger, single-unit activity, rhesus monkeys, squirrel monkey
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Haplorhini, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Frontal Lobe, Globus Pallidus, Hypothalamus, Macaca mulatta, Neurons, Nucleus Accumbens, Reward, Saimiri, Satiety Response, Self Stimulation, Thalamus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review