Cited by 233Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Single cell activity in ventral prefrontal cortex of behaving monkeys

Rosenkilde, Carl E., Bauer, Richard H., Fuster, Joaquin M.·1981·Brain Research

Abstract

Single unit activity was recorded extracellularly from ventral prefrontal cortex (VPC) of monkeys during performance of two short-term memory tasks: spatial delayed response and delayed matching to sample. The tasks required perception, retention and recognition of visual cues differing in either color or spatial location. Two separate areas of VPC were explored: a lateral area in the lower prefrontal convexity and a medial area around the medial orbital sulcus. Two categories of unit activity were distinguished on the basis of frequency changes to the cue. One was characterized by non-specific discharge independent upon which cue was presented, the other by discriminative discharge related not only to visual qualities of the cue but to the animal's subsequent use of it. Nearly one-half of all units showed altered firing during the retention (delay) period as compared with intertrial control firing. Eighteen per cent displayed delay activity related to the quality of the preceding cue. The lateral and medial segments of VPC were not distinguished by differences of unit activity in cue or delay periods. Post-trial activity was related to presence or absence of reward. Type I cells showed firing changes following choice reinforcement as well as gratuitous reward; some showed changes in opposite direction following unreinforced choices. They may encode the availability of reward. Type II cells showed changes of activity after unreinforced trials and, in some cases, opposite changes after unexpected reward; they were not affected by the reward of normal correct-choice trials. These cells appear to react to deviations from expectancy of reward. Type III cells exhibited comparable firing changes following reinforced and unreinforced choices. They may encode termination of a trial sequence. Type I was more common in lateral than medial VPC, whereas the opposite was true for type II; type III did not clearly predominant in either area. Ablation studies have shown that the two areas of VPC differ in behavioral functions. This study of their cellular properties revealed topographic differences only during the post-trial period. It is therefore possible that the combination of cue and delay activity (related to exteroceptive input) with post-trial activity (related to interoceptive input) constitutes the neuronal basis for the two areas' differences in behavioral function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90160-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding of non-reward neurons is robust: 18/494 (3.6%) of neurons in the original study responded to non-reward, 10/140 (7.1%) in a complementary study, and an fMRI study showed macaque lateral OFC activation when expected reward was not obtained during reversal.

    “The finding of non-reward neurons is robust, in that 18/494 (3.6%) of the neurons in the original study responded to non-reward (Thorpe et al., 1983), consistent results were found in different tasks in a complementary study (10/140 non-reward neurons in the OFC or 7.1%) (Rosenkilde et al., 1981), and an fMRI study has shown that the macaque lateral OFC is activated when an expected reward is not”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Rosenkilde et al., 1981

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 233

Authors
Rosenkilde, C. E., Bauer, R. H., & Fuster, J. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-03
Volume
209
Issue
2
Pages
375-394
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031141545
Cited by
233
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
ventral prefrontal cortex, single-unit activity, short-term memory, delayed matching-to-sample, delay activity, reward expectancy, topographic differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Color Perception, Discrimination Learning, Evoked Potentials, Form Perception, Frontal Lobe, Macaca mulatta, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Motivation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review