Selective histochemical demonstration of dopamine terminal systems in rat di- and telecephalon: New evidence for dopaminergic innervation of hypothalamic neurosecretory nuclei
Abstract
The distribution of dopamine (DA)-containing fibers in the virtual absence of noradrenaline (NA)-containing ones has been mapped by aldehyde fluorescence histochemistry in rats subjected to a combined neurotoxin treatment (intracerebral 6-hydroxydopamine injections plus systemic injections of the selective NA neurotoxin DSP-4). This pretreatment left di- and telencephalic DA levels largely unaffected, but reduced the NA levels by at least 86-96%. The resulting DA:NA ratios suggested that the catecholamine-containing structures, demonstrable by fluorescence histochemistry in the di- and telencephalic regions, were predominantly the DA-containing ones. While the distribution of DA terminal systems in the neo- and allocortical regions conformed well to previous results, the combined neurotoxin treatment revealed new features of the distribution of DA fibers in the diencephalon. In addition to the previously described innervations of the tubero-hypophyseal system, the incerto-hypothalamic system, and the mesohabenular pathway, previously unknown innervations were revealed in the supraoptic, paraventricular and dorsomedial nuclei of the hypothalamus, and in the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus. Apart from some scattered fibers in the periventricular and lateral hypothalamic areas and medical zona incerta, other diencephalic nuclei seemed to be devoid of any significant DA terminal networks. The dopaminergic nature of these innervations is supported by DA uptake experiments…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is evidence of direct dopaminergic fibers to the supraoptic nucleus and the paraventricular nucleus.
“There is also evidence of direct dopaminergic fibers to the supraoptic nucleus and the paraventricular nucleus58”
From Oxytocin pathway gene networks in the human brain (2019) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 158
- Authors
- Lindvall, O., Björklund, A., & Skagerberg, G.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Lindvall, Olle
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 306
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 19-30
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009178283
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Keywords
- diencephalon, norepinephrine, dopamine uptake, oxytocin release, vasopressin release, supraoptic nucleus, paraventricular nucleus, dorsomedial nucleus
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Diencephalon, Dopamine, Female, Hippocampus, Histocytochemistry, Hypothalamus, Limbic System, Norepinephrine, Rats, Inbred Strains, Telencephalon, Thalamus, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review