Three-dimensional analysis of the whole axonal arbors originating from single CA2 pyramidal neurons in the rat hippocampus with the aid of a computer graphic technique
Abstract
The axonal arborization of single pyramidal neurons in field CA2 and the rostral adjacent area of the rat hippocampus was studied with intracellular staining following the pressure microinjection of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in combination with the immunoperoxidase technique, and was analyzed three-dimensionally with the aid of a computer system. The axonal arbors were composed of two types of axon branches, which were distinguished as the primary and secondary axon branches on the basis of morphological criteria. The axon branches in the ipsilateral hippocampus exhibited almost the contour of the dorsal hippocampus. The large amount of axon branches labeled with HRP in the stratum (str.) oriens of field CA1 was comparable to that in the str. radiatum of the field. The labeled axon branches in the dorsal hippocampus were not distributed uniformly in terminal regions but were focused on the caudolateral CA1a-b subfields. Most primary axon branches ran to a focus along the alvear fibers. The lamellar organization in the CA2 pyramidal neurons may be composed of axon branches running caudally and terminal branches forming a focus. The dense association fibers along the septotemporal axis may connect the lamellar organized circuits to each other. Axon branches in the septal nuclei of each hemisphere formed a rather flat plane. The commissural fibers of the CA2 pyramidal neurons seemed to form a symmetrical projection field in the contralateral side against the median plane. The axonal arbors and dendritic expansion of the pyramidal neurons shown in this study appeared to reveal the whole image of the single CA2 pyramidal neuron.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anatomical reconstructions have shown that CA2 pyramidal neurons send their axons to both SR and SO of CA1, whereas ipsilateral CA3 neurons only send their axons to SR.
“Anatomical reconstructions have shown that CA2 pyramidal neurons send their axons to both SR and stratum oriens (SO) of CA1 (Tamamaki et al., 1988), whereas ipsilateral CA3 neurons only send their axons to SR.”
From Strong CA2 Pyramidal Neuron Synapses Define a Powerful Disynaptic Cortico-Hippocampal Loop (2010) · cites this paper as Tamamaki et al., 1988
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 156
- Authors
- Tamamaki, N., Abe, K., & Nojyo, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Fukui (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Tamamaki, Nobuaki
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-06
- Volume
- 452
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 255-272
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041579561
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
- Keywords
- hippocampus, axonal arborization, axon branching, lamellar structure, commissural projections, septal nuclei, CA1 subfield, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axons, Hippocampus, Horseradish Peroxidase, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review