The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensorimotor and cognitive consequences of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats
Open accessAbstract
Rats were subjected to either right proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion or sham operation, and examined for an extended period on a battery of tests designed to measure simple motor function, sensorimotor integration and cognitive function. Rats with MCA occlusion showed extensive neuronal loss in the dorsolateral striatum and variable neuron loss in the parietal, temporal and frontolateral neocortex. MCA occluded animals exhibited significant impairments in tests of postural reflex, visual and tactile forelimb placing, locomotor coordination, and a test of simultaneous bilateral tactile extinction. The reflex and sensorimotor function deficits recovered to pre-operative levels by Day 30 post-ischemia. Five weeks following surgery, rats were tested in 2 versions of the Morris water task. Rats with MCA occlusion demonstrated significant impairments in their ability to navigate to a hidden platform, but were not significantly impaired on the visible (cued) version of the task. This general pattern of transient sensorimotor and reflex deficits, but with more persistent cognitive impairments, is similar to that seen in humans following MCA infarcts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bederson, J. B., Pitts, L. H., Tsuji, M., Nishimura, M. C., Davis, R. L., & Bartkowski, H. (1986) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.17.3.472 · Cited by 2,681
Cited by
Recommendations for Standards Regarding Preclinical Neuroprotective and Restorative Drug Development
(1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.12.2752 · Cited by 1,251
Treatment of neural injury with marrow stromal cells
Chopp, M., & Li, Y. (2002) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00040-6 · Cited by 624
Chen, J., Li, Y., Wang, L., Lu, M., Zhang, X., & Chopp, M. (2001) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(01)00557-3 · Cited by 527
Revisiting the cholinergic hypothesis in the development of Alzheimer's disease
Craig, L. A., Hong, N. S., & McDonald, R. J. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.001 · Cited by 486
Rogers, D. C., Campbell, C. A., Stretton, J. L., & Mackay, K. B. (1997) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.28.10.2060 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Markgraf, C. G., Green, E. J., Hurwitz, B. E., Morikawa, E., Dalton Dietrich, W., McCabe, P. M., Ginsberg, M. D., & Schneiderman, N.
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 575
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-246
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983845697
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensorimotor and cognitive consequences of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0006-8993(92)90085-n
- The paper
- Markgraf, C. G., Green, E. J., Hurwitz, B. E., Morikawa, E., Dalton Dietrich, W., McCabe, P. M., Ginsberg, M. D., & Schneiderman, N. (1992). Sensorimotor and cognitive consequences of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(92)90085-n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
