Cited by 42Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) levels in brains from Alzheimer disease patients and controls

Pirttilä, T., Soininen, H., Heinonen, O., Lehtimäki, T., Bogdanovic, N., Paljärvi, L., Kosunen, O., Winblad, B. +3 more·1996·Brain Research

Abstract

We measured apolipoprotein E (apoE) level in neutral and acidic pH extracts of the frontal, temporal and cerebellar cortices from patients with definite Alzheimer's disease (AD) and controls, and analyzed the relationship among apoE levels, clinical and neuropathological findings, and apoE genotype. Our data showed that the levels varied in different brain regions being lowest in the frontal cortex and highest in the cerebellum in Ad brains. ApoE levels in neutral pH extracts from the frontal cortex from AD patients were significantly lower than those of controls, and correlated negatively with the number of neurofibrillary tangles. ApoE genotype was not associated with the levels of apoE. There was no correlation between apoE levels and amyloid load or synaptophysin-immunoreactivity in the brain. We conclude that apoE levels are not increased in AD brains. However, apoE levels vary in different brain regions, and local factors related to the synthesis and metabolism of apoE may be crucial in the pathogenesis of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00183-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ApoE levels may be artificially altered by postmortem delay.

    “In addition, apoE levels may be artificially altered by postmortem delay (Pirttila et al., 1996).”

    From The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as Pirttila et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pirttilä, T., Soininen, H., Heinonen, O., Lehtimäki, T., Bogdanovic, N., Paljärvi, L., Kosunen, O., Winblad, B., Riekkinen, P., Wisniewski, H. M., & Mehta, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University Hospital (FI)
  • Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Mehta, P.D.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-05
Volume
722
Issue
1-2
Pages
71-77
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002589314
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG04220, P01AG004220)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, Alzheimer's disease, frontal cortex, cerebellum, neurofibrillary tangles, amyloid load, synaptophysin, APOE genotype
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Genotype, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Phenotype, Reference Values, Time Factors, Synaptophysin, Neurofibrillary Tangles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review