Cited by 145Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Psychological and social outcome of prominent ear correction in children

Open access
Bradbury, Eileen T., Hewison, Jennifer, Timmons, Michael J.·1992·British Journal of Plastic Surgery

Abstract

The effectiveness of surgery to correct prominent ears in relieving the psychosocial distress of children has been analysed in this prospective study. 30 children and their families were assessed preoperatively and again 12 months postoperatively. It was found that whilst prominent ear correction improved the well-being of 90% of the children, there was a small group of acutely distressed children who remained dissatisfied with outcome. These were children who were socially isolated prior to surgery. Careful screening and referral back to the family doctor of the more distressed children is recommended.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0007-1226(92)90165-t

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By intervening during the newborn period, psychosocial morbidity, pain, and surgical correction costs are avoided.

    “By intervening during the newborn period, psychosocial morbidity, pain, and surgical correction costs are avoided (3–6).”

    From Using Ear Molding to Treat Congenital Auricular Deformities (2021) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Abstract reports teasing, anxiety, and social distress among children seeking ear correction, while the Discussion describes surgery as stressful and potentially painful. But this study involved children aged 5–16 (Patients and methods); it does not assess newborn intervention, show that it avoids those outcomes, or address surgical costs. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Congenital ear anomalies can cause lasting psychosocial consequences for children.

    “Congenital ear anomalies have been known to cause lasting psychosocial consequences for children.”

    From Non-surgical Correction of Congenital Ear Anomalies: A Review of the Literature (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Abstract reports teasing, anxiety and social distress among children seeking correction of prominent ears. The Results report continued teasing and social isolation in some children at the 12-month follow-up. The study concerns prominent ears, not congenital ear anomalies generally, and does not establish that the anomalies caused lasting distress. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychosocial consequences of ear anomalies are mitigated but not always fully disappear after otoplasty.

    “Furthermore, psychosocial consequences will be mitigated, but will not always fully disappear by performing an otoplasty.18,19”
  • Ear molding during the neonatal period offers a window of opportunity for correcting auricular deformities and less severe malformations.

    “Ear molding during the neonatal period offers a window of opportunity for correcting auricular deformities and less severe malformations.”

    From Using Ear Molding to Treat Congenital Auricular Deformities (2021) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Abstract and Patients and methods describe surgical correction of prominent ears in children aged 5–16, not neonatal ear molding. Searches for neonatal molding and nonsurgical correction found no passage addressing the claimed window of opportunity or correction of less severe malformations. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 145

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Moos, R. and Moos, B. (1986). Family Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, California, Consulting Psychologists Press.

Authors
Bradbury, E. T., Hewison, J., & Timmons, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Plastic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
97-100
ISSN
0007-1226 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083110379
Cited by
145
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
otoplasty, children, psychosocial distress, social isolation, patient satisfaction, well-being, surgical outcomes, general practitioner referral
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Self Concept, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Surgery, Plastic, Time Factors, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review