The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Cited by
Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(92)90039-z · Cited by 1,856
Pulvermüller, F. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x9900182x · Cited by 1,284
Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(93)90026-2 · Cited by 820
Self-citationFractionating Language: Different Neural Subsystems with Different Sensitive Periods
Neville, H. J., Mills, D. L., & Lawson, D. S. (1992) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/2.3.244 · Cited by 507
Subjacency as a processing phenomenon
Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969308407588 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Friederici, A.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-166
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991786918
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90016-2
- The paper
- Friederici, A. (1985). Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90016-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
