CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 95

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Insert for regulating temperatures between 2 and 1000 K in a liquid helium dewar: Description and cryogenic analysis

Barlet, A., Genna, J.C., Lethuillier, P.·1991·Cryogenics
DOI 10.1016/0011-2275(91)90138-m
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0011-2275(91)90138-m

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under cryogenic temperatures and high vacuum, convection and conduction are greatly suppressed or eliminated, leaving thermal radiation as the dominant heat exchange pathway.

    “Under conditions of cryogenic temperatures and high vacuum, conventional heat transfer mechanisms such as convection and conduction are greatly suppressed or even completely eliminated, leaving thermal radiation as the dominant pathway for heat exchange [6,7].”

    From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. DeLong, 1971, Rev Sci Instrum, 42, 147, 10.1063/1.1684846 · DOI
  2. Engel, 1984, Rev Sci Instrum, 55, 1489, 10.1063/1.1137965 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barlet, A., Genna, J. C., & Lethuillier, P.
Venue
Cryogenics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-09
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
801-805
ISSN
0011-2275
DOI
10.1016/0011-2275(91)90138-m
Cited by
95
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review