Cited by 4Muscle activation and electromyography studiesMotor Control and AdaptationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Effects of premotion silent period on single motor unit firing at initiation of a rapid contraction

Tsukahara, R·1995·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

We compared the single motor unit (SMU) activity between movements with a premotion silent period (PMSP) and without PMSP in EMG. Fourteen SMUs in the gastrocnemius muscle and 6 SMUs in the soleus muscle were recorded from 5 volunteers during isometric plantar flexion. Tonically firing SMUs failed to fire just before the onset of a rapid contraction with PMSP more frequently than without PMSP. SMUs tended to fire within 10 msec (the gastrocnemius SMUs) or 20 msec (the soleus SMUs) from the onset of the phasic EMG discharge when PMSP occurred. In a rapid contraction without PMSP, the initial firing of SMUs occurred with longer latency than that in a rapid contraction with PMSP. The latency of the initial SMU firing in a rapid contraction related to the preceding time of the last SMU firing during a sustained contraction to the onset of the phasic EMG discharge. When the preceding firing was long enough, the latency distributed around 10 msec. On the other hand, for shorter preceding times, the latency lengthened with shortening of the preceding time. It is suggested that the PMSP makes the preceding time long and increases the susceptibility of motor units to the descending command at the initiation of a rapid contraction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00327-h

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Silent periods (unintentional and voluntary) are thought to enable motor neurons to achieve a non-refractory state leading to more synchronous recruitment and a greater discharge rate of motor units during the subsequent ballistic action.

    “These silent periods (unintentional and voluntary) are thought to enable motor neurons to achieve a non-refractory state leading to a more synchronous recruitment and a greater discharge rate of motor units during the subsequent ballistic action”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 4

Authors
Tsukahara, R.
Affiliations
Aichi Human Service Center (JP)
Corresponding author
Tsukahara, R
Venue
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-10
Volume
97
Issue
5
Pages
223-230
ISSN
0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4251186668
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
motor unit firing, motor unit activity, motor control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review