Effects of premotion silent period on single motor unit firing at initiation of a rapid contraction
Abstract
We compared the single motor unit (SMU) activity between movements with a premotion silent period (PMSP) and without PMSP in EMG. Fourteen SMUs in the gastrocnemius muscle and 6 SMUs in the soleus muscle were recorded from 5 volunteers during isometric plantar flexion. Tonically firing SMUs failed to fire just before the onset of a rapid contraction with PMSP more frequently than without PMSP. SMUs tended to fire within 10 msec (the gastrocnemius SMUs) or 20 msec (the soleus SMUs) from the onset of the phasic EMG discharge when PMSP occurred. In a rapid contraction without PMSP, the initial firing of SMUs occurred with longer latency than that in a rapid contraction with PMSP. The latency of the initial SMU firing in a rapid contraction related to the preceding time of the last SMU firing during a sustained contraction to the onset of the phasic EMG discharge. When the preceding firing was long enough, the latency distributed around 10 msec. On the other hand, for shorter preceding times, the latency lengthened with shortening of the preceding time. It is suggested that the PMSP makes the preceding time long and increases the susceptibility of motor units to the descending command at the initiation of a rapid contraction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Silent periods (unintentional and voluntary) are thought to enable motor neurons to achieve a non-refractory state leading to more synchronous recruitment and a greater discharge rate of motor units during the subsequent ballistic action.
“These silent periods (unintentional and voluntary) are thought to enable motor neurons to achieve a non-refractory state leading to a more synchronous recruitment and a greater discharge rate of motor units during the subsequent ballistic action”
From Maximal discharge rate of motor units determines the maximal rate of force development during ballistic contractions in human (2014) · cites this paper as Tsukahara et al., 1995
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 4
- Authors
- Tsukahara, R.
- Affiliations
- Aichi Human Service Center (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Tsukahara, R
- Venue
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 223-230
- ISSN
- 0013-4694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4251186668
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- motor unit firing, motor unit activity, motor control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review