X‐ray diffraction study of the insoluble organic matrix of mollusk shells
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The difference in capacity in regulating calcium carbonate precipitation between aspartic acid and glutamic acid stems from the slight variance in geometry and larger space that allows the carboxylate group in aspartic acids to bind with multiple calcium ions, while glutamic acid can only bind to fewer cations.
“This difference in capacity in regulating calcium carbonate precipitation stems from the slight variance in geometry and larger space that allows the carboxylate group in aspartic acids to bind with multiple calcium ions, while glutamic acid can only bind to fewer cations.61”
From Organic Controls over Biomineral Ca-Mg Carbonate Compositions and Morphologies (2023) · cites this paper as [61]
The Introduction discusses shell-matrix proteins as possible templates for mineral deposition, and the Results describe the orientations of proteins, chitin, and aragonite. Neither section addresses whether aspartic and glutamic acid differ in calcium-ion binding or in their regulation of calcium carbonate precipitation (searched for those amino acids, carboxylate binding, and precipitation). (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 300
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [6]6. Krampitz, G., Engels, J. and Cazaux, C. (1976) in: The Mechanisms of Mineralization in the Invertebrates and Plants (Watabe, N. and Wilbur, K. M. eds) pp. 155-173, Univ. South Carolina Press, SC.
- Authors
- Weiner, S., & Traub, W.
- Affiliations
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Venue
- FEBS Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-03-10
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 311-316
- ISSN
- 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2026007013
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- FEBS Letters (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Minerva Foundation
- Israel Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone and Dental Protein Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Diatoms and Algae Research
- Keywords
- mollusk shells, organic matrix, shell formation, X-ray diffraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review