The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The processing of peptide precursors: ‘Proline‐directed arginyl cleavage’ and other monobasic processing mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
The classical conversion site in precursors of regulatory peptides is a sequence of two basic amino acids. During recent years, however, a group of monobasic cleavage sites has emerged. In certain cell systems it has been shown that the monobasic cleavage mechanism is both a specific mechanism which only attacks a particular basic residue, and a distinct mechanism which can be separated from the dibasic cleaving mechanism within the same cell. The vast majority of monobasic cleavages occur at single arginines although cleavage after a lysine residue has also been demonstrated. There is no ‘consensus sequence’ of amino acids surrounding the single basic residue which is the apparent signal for proteolytic processing. However, in approximately one third of the cases, a proline residue is found either just before or just after the basic residue. On the basis of this ‘proline‐directed arginyl cleavage’ it is discussed how the conformation of the peptide backbone might be important for this type of cleavage. Finally, it is suggested that tissue‐specific expression of different processing enzymes, e.g. dibasic and monobasic specific forms, might explain the tissue‐specific processing of precursors like the pro‐opiomelanocortin and the CKK. and somatostatin precursor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nucleotide sequence of cloned cDNA encoding bovine arginine vasopressin-neurophysin II precursor
Land, H., Schütz, G., Schmale, H., & Richter, D. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/295299a0 · Cited by 569
Pancreatic preproglucagon cDNA contains two glucagon-related coding sequences arranged in tandem
Lund, P. K., Goodman, R. H., Dee, P. C., & Habener, J. F. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.2.345 · Cited by 295
Cited by
Drucker, D. J., Philippe, J., Mojsov, S., Chick, W. L., & Habener, J. F. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.10.3434 · Cited by 903
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, T. W.
- Venue
- FEBS Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-05-05
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-3468
- OpenAlex
- W1534207825
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The processing of peptide precursors: ‘Proline‐directed arginyl cleavage’ and other monobasic processing mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0014-5793(86)80500-2
- The paper
- Schwartz, T. W. (1986). The processing of peptide precursors: ‘Proline‐directed arginyl cleavage’ and other monobasic processing mechanisms. FEBS Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(86)80500-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.