The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of three‐dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance geometry‐dynamical simulated annealing calculations
Open accessAbstract
A new hybrid distance space‐real space method for determining three‐dimensional structures of proteins on the basis of interproton distance restraints is presented. It involves the following steps: (i) the approximate polypeptide fold is obtained by generating a set of substructures comprising only a small subset of atoms by projection from multi‐dimensional distance space into three‐dimensional cartesian coordinate space using a procedure known as ‘embedding’; (ii) all remaining atoms are then added by best fitting extended amino acids one residue at a time to the substructures; (iii) the resulting structures are used as the starting point for real space dynamical simulated annealing calculations. The latter involve heating the system to a high temperature followed by slow cooling in order to overcome potential barriers along the pathway towards the global minimum region. This is carried out by solving Newton's equations of motion. Unlike conventional restrained molecular dynamics, however, the non‐bonded interactions are represented by a simple van der Waals repulsion term. The method is illustrated by calculations on crambin (46 residues) and the globular domain of histone H5 (79 residues). It is shown that the hybrid method is more efficient computationally and samples a larger region of conformational space consistent with the experimental data than full metric matrix distance geometry calculations alone, particularly for large systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Cited by
Crump, M. P., Gong, J., Loetscher, P., Rajarathnam, K., Amara, A., Arenzana‐Seisdedos, F., Virelizier, J., Baggiolini, M., Sykes, B. D., & Clark‐Lewis, I. (1997) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/16.23.6996 · Cited by 731
Solution structure of the N-terminal zinc binding domain of HIV-1 integrase
Cai, M., Zheng, R., Caffrey, M., Craigie, R., Clore, G. M., & Gronenborn, A. M. (1997) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0797-567 · Cited by 342
Self-citationSolution Structure of the DNA Binding Domain of HIV-1 Integrase
Lodi, P. J., Ernst, J. A., Kuszewski, J., Hickman, A. B., Engelman, A., Craigie, R., Clore, G. M., & Gronenborn, A. M. (1995) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00031a002 · Cited by 300
Self-citationNominé, Y., Masson, M., Charbonnier, S., Zanier, K., Ristriani, T., Deryckère, F., Sibler, A.-P., Desplancq, D., Atkinson, R. A., Weiss, E., et al. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.024 · Cited by 177
Deep learning in biomedical data science
Baldi, P. (2018) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013343 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Nilges, M., Clore, G. M., & Gronenborn, A. M.
- Venue
- FEBS Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-03-14
- Volume
- 229
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 317-324
- ISSN
- 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-3468
- OpenAlex
- W2037304739
- Cited by
- 770
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of three‐dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance geometry‐dynamical simulated annealing calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0014-5793(88)81148-7
- The paper
- Nilges, M., Clore, G. M., & Gronenborn, A. M. (1988). Determination of three‐dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance geometry‐dynamical simulated annealing calculations. FEBS Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(88)81148-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.