Cited by 96Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Molecular cloning, functional expression, and signal transduction of the GIP‐receptor cloned from a human insulinoma

Open access
Volz, Anja, Göke, Rüdiger, Lankat-Buttgereit, Brigitte, Fehmann, Hans-C., Bode, Hans P., Göke, Burkhard·1995·FEBS Letters

Abstract

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) plays an important role in the regulation of postprandial insulin secretion and proinsulin gene expression of pancreatic β‐cells. This study demonstrates the molecular cloning of a cDNA for the GIP‐receptor from a human insulinoma λgt11 cDNA library. The cloned cDNA encoded a seven transmembrane domain protein of 466 amino acids which showed high homology (41%) to the human glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) receptor. Homology to the GIP receptor from rat or hamster was 79% and 81%, respectively. When transfected stably into fibroblast CHL‐cells a high affinity receptor was expressed which coupled to the adenylate cyclase with normal basal cAMP and increasing intracellular cAMP levels under stimulation with human GIP‐1–42 (EC 50 = 1.29 × 10−13 M). The receptor accepted only human GIP 1–42 (K d = 1.93 ± 0.2 × 10−8 M) and porcine truncated GIP‐1–30 (K d = 1.13 ± 0.1 × 10−8 M) as high affinity ligands. At 1 μM, exendin‐4 and (9–39)amide weakly reduced GIP‐binding (25%) whereas secretin, glucagon, glucagon‐like peptide‐1, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, peptide histidine‐isoleucine, and pituitary adenylyl cyclase activating peptide were without effect. In transfected CHL cells, GIP‐1–42 did not increase intracellular calcium. Northern analysis revealed one transcript of human GIP receptor mRNA with an apparent size of 5.5 kb. The exact understanding of GIP receptor regulation and signal transduction will aid in the understanding of the incretin hormone's failure to exert its biological action at the pancreatic B‐cell in type II diabetes mellitus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0014-5793(95)01006-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GLP-1/GIP binding induces a conformational change in the receptors, GDP/GTP exchange, dissociation of the Gsα-subunit, activation of adenylate cyclase to convert ATP into cAMP, and stimulation of the cAMP signaling pathway.

    “The binding induces a conformational change in the receptors' structure, followed by the exchange of guanosine diphosphate for guanosine triphosphate and the subsequent dissociation of the Gsα-subunit from the receptors. This subunit, in turn, activates adenylate cyclase to convert ATP into cAMP, thereby stimulating the cAMP signaling pathway described above.77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82”

    From Pancreatic regulation of glucose homeostasis. (2016) · cites this paper as [82]

    Section 3.4 (page not provided) reports that GIP increased cAMP in cells expressing the cloned GIP receptor, consistent with signaling through adenylyl cyclase. The paper does not describe receptor conformational change, GDP–GTP exchange, Gsα dissociation, or ATP conversion, and it does not test the proposed sequence for the GLP-1 receptor. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 96

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fehmann, H.C. and G6ke, B. (1995) Peptides 16 (in press).
  2. Roher, L., Raulf, F., Bruns, R., Buettner, B., Hofstaedter, F. and Schfile, R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 4196- 4200.

Authors
Volz, A., Göke, R., Lankat-Buttgereit, B., Fehmann, H.-C., Bode, H. P., & Göke, B.
Affiliations
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-10-02
Volume
373
Issue
1
Pages
23-29
ISSN
  • 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-3468
OpenAlex
W2065940035
Cited by
96
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEBS Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, GIP receptor, insulinoma, cDNA cloning, G protein-coupled receptors, adenylate cyclase coupling, cAMP signaling, receptor ligand specificity, exendin-4, incretins, pancreatic beta cells, type 2 diabetes
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Binding, Competitive, Clone Cells, Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide, Glucagon, Cricetinae, Humans, Insulinoma, Kinetics, Molecular Sequence Data, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Peptide Fragments, Protein Precursors, Receptors, Gastrointestinal Hormone, Recombinant Proteins, Substrate Specificity, Swine, Transfection, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Signal Transduction, Gene Library, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Receptors, Glucagon, Rats, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review