Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 635

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability

Kemp, René·1994·Futures
DOI 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Nelson, 1977, In search of useful theory of innovation, Research Policy, 6, 57, 10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Nelson, 1977, In search of useful theory of innovation, Research Policy, 6, 57, 10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Dosi, 1982, Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy, 6, 152
  4. Dosi, 1988, Sources, procedures and micro-economic effects of innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1127
  5. Dosi, 1982, Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy, 6, 153
  6. Dosi, 1988, Sources, procedures and micro-economic effects of innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1128
  7. Kemp, 1992, The greening of technological progress: an evolutionary perspective, Futures, 24, 437, 10.1016/0016-3287(92)90015-8 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ayres, 1985, A Schumpeterian model of technological substitution, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 27, 375, 10.1016/0040-1625(85)90018-6 · doi:10.1016/0040-1625(85)90018-6
  9. David, 1985, Clio and the economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review, 75, 332
  10. David, 1990, The economics of compatibility standards: an introduction to recent research, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1, 3, 10.1080/10438599000000002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Walsh, 1984, Invention and innovation in the chemical industry: demand-pull or discovery-push?, Research Policy, 13, 211, 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90015-5 · DOI
  12. Saviotti, 1984, A theoretical approach to the construction of technological output indicators, Research Policy, 13, 149, 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90022-2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cornish, 1993, 1993 as predicted in 1893: if they could see us now, The Futurist
  14. Walsh, op cit, reference 24, pages 227–232.
  15. Templin, 1991, California rules push car makers to clean up act, Wall Street Journal Europe, 27
  16. 1990, Financial Times
  17. Jackson, 1992, Renewable energy. Summary paper for the renewables series, Energy Policy, 869
  18. 1992, Intermediair

Cited by

See all 635

Metadata

Authors
Kemp, R.
Venue
Futures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-12
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
1023-1046
ISSN
0016-3287 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-x
OpenAlex
W1523351240
Cited by
635
References
3
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-x
The paper
Kemp, R. (1994). Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability. Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.