Cited by 157Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsIgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases

Randomized trial of chlorambucil for primary biliary cirrhosis

Open access
Hoofnagle, Jay H., Davis, Gary L., Schafer, Daniel F., Peters, Marion, Avigan, Mark I., Pappas, S.Chris, Hanson, Reginald G., Minuk, Gerald Y. +4 more·1986·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Twenty-four patients with primary biliary cirrhosis were entered into a prospective, randomized trial of chlorambucil therapy. Thirteen patients received chlorambucil (0.5-4 mg/day) and 11 patients received no therapy; all have been followed for 2-6 yr (mean, 4.1 yr). Two control but no treated patients died. Average serum bilirubin, serum aspartate aminotransferase activities, and albumin levels improved or remained unchanged in treated patients but worsened in controls. Serum alkaline phosphatase levels did not change in either group. Immunoglobulin M levels decreased and became normal in all treated patients but in only 3 control patients. Liver biopsy histology revealed an improvement in inflammatory cell infiltrate in treated patients in comparison with controls, but no significant change in degree of fibrosis or the histologic stage of disease. Side effects of therapy included bone marrow suppression necessitating discontinuation of the drug in 4 patients. These findings indicate that chlorambucil therapy may retard the progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. Whether such therapy will ultimately decrease morbidity and improve survival in this disease can only be demonstrated by large-scale, placebo-controlled trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90183-6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 157

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lee RG, Epstein 0, Juaregi HO, Sherlock S, Scheuer PJ. Granulomas in primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1981;81:983-6.

Authors
Hoofnagle, J. H., Davis, G. L., Schafer, D. F., Peters, M., Avigan, M. I., Pappas, S. C., Hanson, R. G., Minuk, G. Y., Dusheiko, G. M., Campbell, G., MacSween, R. N. M., & Jones, E. A.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-12
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
1327-1334
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1753515503
Cited by
157
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › IgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, chlorambucil, immunosuppressive therapy, disease progression, serum bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, immunoglobulin M, liver histopathology, myelosuppression, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Bilirubin, Biopsy, Chlorambucil, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review