Cited by 101Celiac Disease Research and ManagementGastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and health

Fasting breath hydrogen in celiac disease

Corazza, Gino Roberto, Strocchi, Alessandra, Gasbarrini, Giovanni·1987·Gastroenterology

Abstract

We studied the possible clinical significance of high basal levels of H2 by analyzing the breath excreted by the following fasting subjects: 50 healthy volunteers, 149 subjects with functional bowel disorders, 16 patients with small bowel bacterial overgrowth proven by bacteriology, 34 patients with untreated celiac disease, 40 patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet, and 40 patients with disorders of the small intestine other than celiac disease (disease controls). The fasting levels of H2 in untreated celiac patients (mean 22.5 +/- 19.3 ppm) were significantly higher than those in healthy volunteers (5.8 +/- 3.1 ppm), patients with functional bowel disorders (6.6 +/- 4.4 ppm), treated celiac patients (9.9 +/- 8.1 ppm), and disease controls (7.0 +/- 6.7 ppm). No significant difference was found between patients with untreated celiac disease and bacterial overgrowth (mean 14.7 +/- 14.0 ppm). The percentage of patients with elevated H2 fasting levels in untreated celiac disease (58.8%) was significantly higher than that in the other groups, except for the patients with bacterial overgrowth (43.7%). In 14 celiac patients, studied before and after a gluten-free diet, fasting H2 levels decreased from 26.6 +/- 18 to 11.6 +/- 10 ppm, becoming normal only in those patients with healing of intestinal lesions. Our results show that high fasting H2 levels are a frequent feature of untreated celiac disease and that the return to normal of these levels is predictive of villous…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90313-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The only proven indication of the lactose-free diet is proven lactose intolerance.

    “The only proven indication of the lactose-free diet is the proven lactose intolerance [95, 96].”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [96]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corazza, G. R., Strocchi, A., & Gasbarrini, G.
Affiliations
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-07
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
53-58
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1574637819
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
celiac disease, hydrogen breath test, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, functional bowel disorders, gluten-free diet, villous atrophy, intestinal healing, small bowel diseases
MeSH terms
Adult, Breath Tests, Celiac Disease, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Fasting, Glutens, Humans, Hydrogen, Intestinal Diseases, Jejunum, Oryza

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review