The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The National Polyp Study
Open accessAbstract
The National Polyp Study (NPS), a randomized clinical trial to evaluate effective surveillance of patients discovered to have one or more colorectal adenomas, was the framework for this statistical analysis which used a multiple logistic model to assess the independent risk factors of patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in adenomas. The database included 3371 adenomas from 1867 patients. Adenoma size and the extent of the villous component were found to be the major independent polyp risk factors associated with high-grade dysplasia (p less than 0.0001). The adjusted odds ratios were 3.3 for medium-sized adenomas and 7.7 for large adenomas relative to small adenomas and 2.7 for villous A adenomas, 3.4 for villous B adenomas, and 8.1 for villous C and D adenomas relative to tubular adenomas. Increased frequency of high-grade dysplasia in adenomas located distal to the splenic flexure was attributable mainly to increased size and villous component rather than to location per se. The adjusted odds ratio was 1.4 (p less than 0.11) for left-sided location. Multiplicity of adenomas affected the risk for high-grade dysplasia in patients but was dependent on adenoma size and villous component and was not an independent factor. The adjusted odds ratio was 1.3 (p less than 0.17) for multiplicity. Increasing age was associated with risk for high-grade dysplasia in patients, and this effect was independent of the effect of adenoma size and histological type. The adjusted odds ratio was 1.8 (p less than 0.0016) for age greater than or equal to 60 yr. Gender was not associated with high-grade dysplasia. The adjusted odds ratio was 1.0 (p less than 0.95) for men. The size of the patient series, the prospective nature of the data collection, the completeness of information on all patients, the requirements of complete examination of the entire colon and pathological examination of all lesions encountered, and the exclusion of patients with previously diagnosed adenomas are, collectively, features unique to this study. The detailed model provided by the analysis integrates multiple patient and adenoma factors associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Colonoscopic Withdrawal Times and Adenoma Detection during Screening Colonoscopy
Barclay, R. L., Vicari, J. J., Doughty, A. S., Johanson, J. F., & Greenlaw, R. L. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055498 · Cited by 1,313
The colorectal adenoma–carcinoma sequence
Leslie, A., Carey, F. A., Pratt, N. R., & Steele, R. J. C. (2002) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02120.x · Cited by 734
Abu Dayyeh, B. K., Thosani, N., Konda, V., Wallace, M. B., Rex, D. K., Chauhan, S. S., Hwang, J. H., Komanduri, S., Manfredi, M., Maple, J. T., et al. (2015) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022 · Cited by 389
Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps
Bond, J. (2000) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9270(00)02227-9 · Cited by 382
Wang, H. S., Pisegna, J., Modi, R., Liang, L.-J., Atia, M., Nguyen, M., Cohen, H., Ohning, G., van Oijen, M., & Spiegel, B. M. R. (2013) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.038 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, M. J., Winawer, S. J., Zauber, A. G., Gottlieb, L. S., Sternberg, S. S., Diaz, B., Dickersin, G. R., Ewing, S., Geller, S., Kasimian, D., Komorowski, R., & Szporn, A.
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 371-379
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1594235143
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The National Polyp Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0016-5085(90)90827-n
- The paper
- O'Brien, M. J., Winawer, S. J., Zauber, A. G., Gottlieb, L. S., Sternberg, S. S., Diaz, B., Dickersin, G. R., Ewing, S., Geller, S., Kasimian, D., Komorowski, R., & Szporn, A. (1990). The National Polyp Study. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(90)90827-n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.