The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage
Open accessAbstract
In a double-blind randomized trial, the hemodynamic events following the administration of propranolol (n = 51) or a placebo (n = 51) were prospectively studied in cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. The hepatic venous pressure gradient, heart rate, and variceal size were determined at the baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after the beginning of therapy. Baseline values were similar in both groups. At 3 months, the hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased significantly in propranolol-treated patients (from 18.1 +/- 4.2 to 15.7 +/- 3.4 mm Hg; P less than 0.05) but not in patients receiving the placebo (19.6 +/- 6.8 to 17.5 +/- 5.3 mm Hg; NS). At subsequent time intervals this gradient decreased significantly from the baseline value in both groups. Heart rate decreased significantly in the propranolol-treated group at all times (P less than 0.001). Variceal hemorrhage occurred in 13 patients (11 placebo-, 2 propranolol-treated; P less than 0.01), all of whom had a hepatic venous pressure gradient greater than 12 mm Hg. In 21 patients (14 propranolol-, 7 placebo-treated) the hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased to less than or equal to 12 mm Hg; none of them bled from esophageal varices, and their mortality rate also decreased. Because most of the bleeding events occurred during the first year (10 placebo-, 1 propranolol-treated; P less than 0.01), propranolol seems to have its protective effect during the period associated with the largest reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient. Because a reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient to less than 12 mm Hg protects from variceal bleeding and increases the rate of survival, this should be the aim of the pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ripoll, C., Groszmann, R., Garcia–Tsao, G., Grace, N., Burroughs, A., Planas, R., Escorsell, A., Garcia–Pagan, J. C., Makuch, R., Patch, D., et al. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.024 · Cited by 1,183
Self-citationGarcia‐Tsao, G., Friedman, S., Iredale, J., & Pinzani, M. (2010) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.23478 · Cited by 538
Self-citationVerbeke, L., Farre, R., Trebicka, J., Komuta, M., Roskams, T., Klein, S., Elst, I. V., Windmolders, P., Vanuytsel, T., Nevens, F., et al. (2014) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.26939 · Cited by 258
Vlachogiannakos, J., Viazis, N., Vasianopoulou, P., Vafiadis, I., Karamanolis, D. G., & Ladas, S. D. (2013) · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1111/jgh.12070 · Cited by 206
González-Abraldes, J., Albillos, A., Bañares, R., Del Arbol, L. R., Moitinho, E., Rodríguez, C., González, M., Escorsell, A., García-Pagán, J. C., & Bosch, J. (2001) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2001.26288 · Cited by 165
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Groszmann, R. J., Bosch, J., Grace, N. D., Conn, H. O., Garcia-Tsao, G., Navasa, M., Alberts, J., Rodes, J., Fischer, R., Bermann, M., Rofe, S., Patrick, M., & Lerner, E.
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1401-1407
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1490907837
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0016-5085(90)91168-6
- The paper
- Groszmann, R. J., Bosch, J., Grace, N. D., Conn, H. O., Garcia-Tsao, G., Navasa, M., Alberts, J., Rodes, J., Fischer, R., Bermann, M., Rofe, S., Patrick, M., & Lerner, E. (1990). Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(90)91168-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.