Cited by 287Liver Diseases and ImmunityDermatology and Skin DiseasesPain Mechanisms and Treatments

A controlled trial of naloxone infusions for the pruritus of chronic cholestasis

Open access
Bergasa, Nora V., Talbot, Thomas L., Alling, David W., Schmitt, Joseph M., Walker, Elijah C., Baker, Bennie L., Korenman, Julia C., Park, Yoon +2 more·1992·Gastroenterology

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that opioid agonist activity contributes to the pruritus of cholestasis, a placebo-controlled single-blinded trial of naloxone, an opioid antagonist, was conducted in eight patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. After discontinuation of all conventional antipruritic medications, one or two continuous (24-hour) IV infusions of naloxone (0.2 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) and placebo solution were administered consecutively in an order that was not predetermined. Pruritus was assessed subjectively by means of four hourly recordings of a visual analogue score. In addition, objective measurements of scratching activity that were independent of gross body movements were continuously recorded using an apparatus specifically designed to measure the frequencies associated with this activity. No side effects associated with naloxone infusions were observed. Only scratching activity data obtained for the same periods of day and night during both naloxone and placebo infusions were compared. Naloxone infusions were consistently associated with a decrease in values of the scratching activity index. In addition, in 50% of the patients the infusions were associated with a decrease in visual analogue score. The mean decrease in scratching activity ranged from 29% to 96% (mean, 50%; P less than 0.001). These findings imply that increased opioid agonist activity contributes to scratching activity in cholestatic patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90102-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Opiate antagonists (oral naltrexone and parenteral naloxone) are increasingly used as third-line therapy as they reduce the sensation of itching and scratching activity.

    “Opiate antagonists (oral naltrexone and parenteral naloxone) are increasingly used as third-line therapy as they reduce the sensation of itching and scratching activity.186 190–192”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 287

Authors
Bergasa, N. V., Talbot, T. L., Alling, D. W., Schmitt, J. M., Walker, E. C., Baker, B. L., Korenman, J. C., Park, Y., Hoofnagle, J. H., & Jones, E. A.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-02
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
544-549
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1495781935
Cited by
287
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
naloxone, pruritus, chronic cholestasis, primary biliary cirrhosis, scratching behavior, opioid antagonists, antipruritic therapy, visual analogue score
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Naloxone, Pilot Projects, Pruritus, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review