Cited by 104Liver Diseases and ImmunityIgG4-Related and Inflammatory DiseasesPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments

Autoimmune cholangiopathy: The result of consecutive primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis?

Colombato, Luis A., Alvarez, Fernando, Côté, Jean, Huet, P.-Michel·1994·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Autoimmune cholangiopathy is a recently proposed entity that describes a specific group of patients presenting overlapping features of primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis, i.e., clinical and/or biochemical cholestasis, high titer antinuclear antibody, negative antimitochondrial antibody, and elevated immunoglobulin G. Liver histology shows primary biliary cirrhosis coexisting with varying degrees of parenchymal inflammation. In addition, these patients achieve remission on corticosteroid therapy. The patient in this report fulfilled the above criteria. However, preceding the autoimmune cholangitis stage, a typical antimitochondrial antibody-positive primary biliary cirrhosis was documented with favorable response to ursodeoxycholic acid treatment. Twenty months later, the patient developed autoimmune hepatitis with elevated aspartate aminotransferase and immunoglobulin G and high titer antinuclear antibody as well as corticosteroid dependency, whereas the antimitochondrial antibody disappeared. The patient's sera initially showed reactivity to three mitochondrial proteins, the 74-, 64-, and 56-kilodalton autoantigens of the 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complexes, which was characteristic of primary biliary cirrhosis. After developing autoimmune hepatitis, reactivity to the 74- and 64-kilodalton antigens disappeared, whereas reactivity to the 56-kilodalton antigen decreased to low levels. Autoimmune cholangitis and probably other forms of the overlap syndrome may re…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90829-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Periodic monitoring of liver tests helps detect patients who are inadequate responders to UDCA after 12 months of therapy, lack of adherence, and the rare patients who go on to develop AIH.

    “This helps detect patients who are inadequate responders to UDCA after 12 months of therapy, lack of adherence, and the rare patients who go on to develop AIH.(121,135,224,225)”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 104

Authors
Colombato, L. A., Alvarez, F., Côté, J., & Huet, P.-M.
Affiliations
Hôpital Saint-Luc (CA)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-12
Volume
107
Issue
6
Pages
1839-1843
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1583668523
Cited by
104
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › IgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
autoimmune cholangiopathy, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, overlap syndrome, cholestasis, antinuclear antibodies, antimitochondrial antibodies, ursodeoxycholic acid, corticosteroid therapy, IgG, disease progression
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Antinuclear, Autoantibodies, Autoantigens, Autoimmune Diseases, Bile Duct Diseases, Female, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Follow-Up Studies, Hepatitis, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Middle Aged, Mitochondria, Liver, Prednisone, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, Immunoblotting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review