Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Concentration, oxidation state, and particulate flux of uranium in the Black Sea

Open access
Anderson, Robert F., Fleisher, Martin Q., LeHuray, Anne P.·1989·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Abstract

In contrast to its unreactive behavior in the open ocean, uranium is removed from seawater to sediments of anoxic marine basins. Four biogeochemical processes have been proposed to account for this removal: active uptake by organisms whose remains are preserved by the anoxic conditions of the sediments; complexation of U(VI) by particulate organic matter; chemical reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) which is scavenged to the sediments by settling particles; and precipitation of uranium within the sediments themselves. The Black Sea is the largest anoxic marine basin in the world today. Waters below 150–200 m are anoxic and H2S levels build up to about 400 μmol 1−1 in the bottom water (maximum depth ~2200 m). Concentrations of total U and the oxidation state of dissolved U were measured throughout the water column while particulate U fluxes were determined from time series sediment trap samples collected in the deep anoxic zone. Bottom waters were depleted in U by ~40% relative to the initial U content of the water. Two independent methods gave residence times of dissolved U in the deep-water column of about 103 years. Uranium occurred throughout the water column as soluble, chemically labile (reducible) U(VI) rather than the thermodynamically favored U(IV). Uranium is neither reduced to U(IV) by the high levels of H2S nor is it rapidly scavenged from the water column as would be expected for strongly hydrolyzed tetravalent actinides like U(IV). Fluxes of particulate authigenic U measured with sediment traps are at least two orders of magnitude less than the rate of authigenic U burial in Black Sea sediments. Therefore, the first three processes listed above contribute negligibly to the deposition of U in the sediments of anoxic marine basins such as the Black Sea. The dominant removal process must involve precipitation of U in the sediments rather than scavenging from the water column.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90345-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, R. F., Fleisher, M. Q., & LeHuray, A. P.
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-09
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
2215-2224
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087053517
Cited by
357
References
0
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concentration, oxidation state, and particulate flux of uranium in the Black Sea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90345-1
The paper
Anderson, R. F., Fleisher, M. Q., & LeHuray, A. P. (1989). Concentration, oxidation state, and particulate flux of uranium in the Black Sea. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90345-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.