The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction between aqueous uranium (VI) and sulfide minerals: Spectroscopic evidence for sorption and reduction
Open accessAbstract
The interaction of aqueous U(VI) with galena and pyrite surfaces under anoxic conditions has been studied by solution analysis and by spectroscopic methods. The solution data indicate that uranyl uptake is strongly dependent on pH; maximum uptake (>98%) occurs above a pH range of between 4.8 and 5.5, depending on experimental conditions. Increasing the sorbate/sorbent ratio results in a relative decrease in uptake of uranyl and in slower sorption kinetics. Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) analysis indicates an inhomogeneous distribution of sorbed uranium at the surface. In the case of galena, formation of small precipitates (~40 nm wide needles) of a uranium oxide compound are found. Pyrite shows a patchy distribution of uranium, mainly associated with oxidized surface species of sulfur and iron. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) yields insight into possible redox processes indicating, for both sulfides, the concomitant formation of polysulfides and a uranium oxide compound with a mixed oxidation state at a U(VI)/U(IV) ratio of ~2. Furthermore, in the case of pyrite, at pH above 6 increased oxidation of sulfur and iron and higher relative amounts of unreduced surface-uranyl are observed. Fourier Transformed Infrared (FTIR) analysis of surface-bound uranyl shows a significant shift of the asymmetric stretching frequency to lower wavenumbers which is consistent with the formation of a U3O8-type compound and thus, independently, confirms the partial reduction of uranyl at the sulfide surface. The combination of AES, XPS, and FTIR provides a powerful approach for identifying mechanisms that govern the interaction of redox sensitive compounds in aqueous systems. Our overall results indicate that sulfide minerals are efficient scavengers of soluble uranyl. Comparing our results with recent field observations, we suggest that thermodynamically metastable U3O8 controls uranium concentrations in many anoxic groundwaters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Acidic mine drainage: the rate-determining step
Singer, P. C., & Stumm, W. (1970) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.167.3921.1121 · Cited by 1,757
Cited by
Surface catalysis of uranium(VI) reduction by iron(II)
Liger, E., Charlet, L., & Van Cappellen, P. (1999) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(99)00265-3 · Cited by 675
Natural fractionation of 238U/235U
Weyer, S., Anbar, A. D., Gerdes, A., Gordon, G. W., Algeo, T. J., & Boyle, E. A. (2008) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2007.11.012 · Cited by 509
O'Loughlin, E. J., Kelly, S. D., Cook, R. E., Csencsits, R., & Kemner, K. M. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0208409 · Cited by 444
In-Situ Evidence for Uranium Immobilization and Remobilization
Senko, J. M., Istok, J. D., Suflita, J. M., & Krumholz, L. R. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011240x · Cited by 340
Dickinson, M., & Scott, T. B. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.060 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Wersin, P., Hochella, M. F., Persson, P., Redden, G., Leckie, J. O., & Harris, D. W.
- Venue
- Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2829-2843
- ISSN
- 0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032978089
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction between aqueous uranium (VI) and sulfide minerals: Spectroscopic evidence for sorption and reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90117-1
- The paper
- Wersin, P., Hochella, M. F., Persson, P., Redden, G., Leckie, J. O., & Harris, D. W. (1994). Interaction between aqueous uranium (VI) and sulfide minerals: Spectroscopic evidence for sorption and reduction. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90117-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.