Cited by 101Indigenous Peoples' Rights and LawConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementIndigenous Cultures and History

A new perspective in aboriginal natural resource management: Co-management

Notzke, Claudia·1995·Geoforum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-7185(95)00019-h

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Notzke, C.
Affiliations
University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
Notzke, Claudia
Venue
Geoforum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-05
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
187-209
ISSN
0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037023499
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoforum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
co-management, renewable resource management, Crown lands, treaty rights, local resource users, state-indigenous relations, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review