Formation of the Galilean Satellites in a Gaseous Nebula
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If moons are present around gas giants, typical timescales for in-situ formation in a gaseous circumplanetary disk range from 10^5-10^6 years for gas-starved disk models down to 10^2-10^4 years for dense circumplanetary disks.
“If moons are present around gas giants, typical timescales for in-situ formation in a gaseous circumplanetary disk ranges from 10 5 -10 6 years for gas starved-disk models (Canup and Ward 2002;Szulágyi et al., 2018) down to 10 2 -10 4 years for dense circumplanetary disks (Lunine and Stevenson 1982).”
From A Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation (2022) · cites this paper as Lunine and Stevenson 1982
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Formation of the Galilean Satellites: Conditions of Accretion
Canup, R. M., & Ward, W. R. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/344684 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Ayliffe, B. A., & Bate, M. R. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15002.x · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Do Proto‐jovian Planets Drive Outflows?
Quillen, A. C., & Trilling, D. E. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306421 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
In Situ formation of Icy Moons of Uranus and Neptune
Szulágyi, J., Cilibrasi, M., & Mayer, L. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaeed6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
A Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation
Sutton, P. J., Albery, B., & Muff, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2022.819933 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lunine, J. I., & Stevenson, D. J.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-39
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974486269
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Icarus (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- Galilean moons, Ganymede, Callisto, satellite formation flying, accretion, primordial atmosphere, partial differentiation, planetesimal fragmentation, surface temperature, Jupiter formation, resurfacing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
