The Saturnian ribbon feature—A baroclinically unstable model
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For jet centers at 35° and 30°, the jet equilibrates in a state more reminiscent of the Ribbon morphology than the Hexagon.
“For the cases when the jet center is placed at 35 ° and 30 ° , the jet equilibrates in a state that is more reminiscent of the morphology of the Ribbon ( Godfrey & Moore 1986; Sayanagi et al. 2010 ) than that of the Hexagon.”
From MEANDERING SHALLOW ATMOSPHERIC JET AS A MODEL OF SATURNʼS NORTH-POLAR HEXAGON (2015) · cites this paper as Godfrey & Moore 1986
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 46 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Godfrey, D. A., & Moore, V.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-11
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-343
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011540205
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Icarus (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- Saturn, baroclinic instability, atmospheric waves, zonal circulation, meridional velocity, westerly jet, latitudinal thermal gradient
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
