The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe uterovaginal prolapse: Results of barrier studies
Abstract
Eleven continent women with severe degrees of uterovaginal prolapse underwent a complete urodynamic evaluation that included passive and dynamic urethral pressure profilometry with and without careful barrier reduction of their prolapse. The aim of barrier placement was to reduce, but not overcorrect, the prolapse and to restrict stress-induced mobility of the viscera posterior and superior to the urethra. Each of the women had very high pressure transmission ratios in each quarter of the urethra (means of 257, 187, 170, and 166% from internal to external quarters) that were significantly reduced with barrier placement (means of 78, 84, 85, and 101%). Eight of 11 subjects had pressure transmission ratios less than 90% in the proximal three-quarters of the urethra with the barrier in place, a finding in nearly all subjects with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Maximum urethral closure pressure on passive urethral pressure profilometry also decreased significantly from a mean of 75 to 45 cm H2O with the barrier in place. We conclude that the stress continence mechanism in women with severe prolapse results from posterior-superior visceral descent with stress, causing mechanical obstruction of the less mobile urethra. The evaluation methods described may be useful in predicting which of these patients may require concurrent urethropexy at the time of prolapse reduction surgery to prevent postoperative stress urinary incontinence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Definition of overactive bladder and epidemiology of urinary incontinence
Hampel, C., Wienhold, D., Benken, N., Eggersmann, C., & Thüroff, J. W. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00578-5 · Cited by 375
THE EFFECT OF GENITAL PROLAPSE ON VOIDING
ROMANZI, L. J., CHAIKIN, D. C., & BLAIVAS, J. G. (1999) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61957-8 · Cited by 296
Barber, M. D., Visco, A. G., Weidner, A. C., Amundsen, C. L., & Bump, R. C. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2000.111298 · Cited by 270
Self-citationWeber, A. M., & Richter, H. E. (2005) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000175832.13266.bb · Cited by 254
Roovers, J. W. R., van der Vaart, C. H., van der Bom, J. G., Schagen van Leeuwen, J. H., Scholten, P. C., & Heintz, A. P. M. (2004) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00001.x · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Bump, R., Fantl, J., & Hurt, W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 314-314
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- OpenAlex
- W1987931796
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe uterovaginal prolapse: Results of barrier studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0020-7292(89)90759-5
- The paper
- Bump, R., Fantl, J., & Hurt, W. (1989). The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe uterovaginal prolapse: Results of barrier studies. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(89)90759-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.