Production of prostacyclin and thromboxane in lupus pregnancies: Effect of small dose of aspirin
Abstract
Objectives To find out whether the tendency toward poor outcome in lupus pregnancies could be explained by changes in prostacyclin/thromboxane production, to relate these changes to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, and to study the potential benefits of low-dose aspirin. Methods We followed the urinary output of prostacyclin metabolites (6-keto-prostaglandin [PG]F1 alpha, 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1 alpha) and thromboxane metabolites (thromboxane B2, 2,3-dinor-thromboxane B2) using high-pressure liquid chromatography followed by radioimmunoassay. We studied 14 pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), of whom six had detectable antiphospholipid antibodies. The patients were randomized by a computerized program to receive either 50 mg aspirin daily (six women) or placebo (eight women). Nine healthy pregnant women served as controls. Results The production of prostacyclin was normal in early pregnancy in SLE patients but was reduced during late gestation in those without antiphospholipid antibodies. The production of thromboxane was increased in SLE patients compared with controls, and this increase was highest (two-to threefold rise) when antiphospholipid antibodies were detectable. Aspirin eliminated thromboxane dominance without affecting prostacyclin production. Conclusion These data suggest that the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in SLE patients may trigger thromboxane dominance, possibly contributing to the adverse outcome of these pregnancies…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data from one placebo-controlled RCT in six women with SLE and three low-quality studies in women without SLE found no difference in live birth prevalence with LDA use.
“Data from one placebo-controlled RCT of LDA in six women with SLE42 and data from three low-quality studies (two RCTs, one retrospective cohort)43–45 of women without SLE found no difference in the prevalence of live births with use of LDA.”
From EULAR recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome in adults (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 36
- Authors
- Kaaja, R., Julkunen, H., Viinikka, L., & Ylikorkala, O.
- Affiliations
- Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-229
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- OpenAlex
- W2017522419
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Keywords
- systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus in pregnancy, antiphospholipid antibodies, prostacyclin, thromboxane, low-dose aspirin, prostacyclin metabolites, thromboxane metabolites, pregnancy outcomes, late pregnancy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aspirin, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Female, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Epoprostenol, Radioimmunoassay, Thromboxanes, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review