Cited by 36Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive System and Pregnancy

Production of prostacyclin and thromboxane in lupus pregnancies: Effect of small dose of aspirin

Kaaja, R., Julkunen, H., Viinikka, L., Ylikorkala, O.·1993·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objectives To find out whether the tendency toward poor outcome in lupus pregnancies could be explained by changes in prostacyclin/thromboxane production, to relate these changes to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, and to study the potential benefits of low-dose aspirin. Methods We followed the urinary output of prostacyclin metabolites (6-keto-prostaglandin [PG]F1 alpha, 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF1 alpha) and thromboxane metabolites (thromboxane B2, 2,3-dinor-thromboxane B2) using high-pressure liquid chromatography followed by radioimmunoassay. We studied 14 pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), of whom six had detectable antiphospholipid antibodies. The patients were randomized by a computerized program to receive either 50 mg aspirin daily (six women) or placebo (eight women). Nine healthy pregnant women served as controls. Results The production of prostacyclin was normal in early pregnancy in SLE patients but was reduced during late gestation in those without antiphospholipid antibodies. The production of thromboxane was increased in SLE patients compared with controls, and this increase was highest (two-to threefold rise) when antiphospholipid antibodies were detectable. Aspirin eliminated thromboxane dominance without affecting prostacyclin production. Conclusion These data suggest that the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in SLE patients may trigger thromboxane dominance, possibly contributing to the adverse outcome of these pregnancies…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0020-7292(93)90340-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data from one placebo-controlled RCT in six women with SLE and three low-quality studies in women without SLE found no difference in live birth prevalence with LDA use.

    “Data from one placebo-controlled RCT of LDA in six women with SLE42 and data from three low-quality studies (two RCTs, one retrospective cohort)43–45 of women without SLE found no difference in the prevalence of live births with use of LDA.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 36

Authors
Kaaja, R., Julkunen, H., Viinikka, L., & Ylikorkala, O.
Affiliations
Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-11
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
229-229
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
OpenAlex
W2017522419
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus in pregnancy, antiphospholipid antibodies, prostacyclin, thromboxane, low-dose aspirin, prostacyclin metabolites, thromboxane metabolites, pregnancy outcomes, late pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aspirin, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Female, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Epoprostenol, Radioimmunoassay, Thromboxanes, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review