The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Categorization of action slips
Norman, D. A. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.1.1 · Cited by 1,736 · cited 1×
“do not attempt to predict errors driven by either slips or conceptual confusions (Norman, 1981).”
Background
Cited by
Nielsen, J. (1995) · Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '95 · doi:10.1145/223355.223730 · Cited by 2,620
Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability
Agarwal, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.168.84 · Cited by 872
Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.
Kushniruk, A. W., & Patel, V. L. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003 · Cited by 760
A Meta-Study of Algorithm Visualization Effectiveness
HUNDHAUSEN, C. D., DOUGLAS, S. A., & STASKO, J. T. (2002) · Journal of Visual Languages & Computing · doi:10.1006/jvlc.2002.0237 · Cited by 719
Jaspers, M. W. M. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002 · Cited by 649
Metadata
- Authors
- Polson, P. G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 741-773
- ISSN
- 0020-7373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118518941
- Cited by
- 797
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-n
- The paper
- Polson, P. G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.