The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Footswitch system for measurement of the temporal parameters of gait
Open accessAbstract
Gait analysis relies upon accurate measurement of initial and end foot contact times. These times act as a reference point for correlating all other gait data and as a mean of distinguishing normal and pathologic gait. We have developed a simple, inexpensive footswitch system that provides accurate estimates of the start and end of stance phase for sequential steps. The estimates of the beginning and end of stance phase do not require custom footwear, extensive calibration, or precise placement of the sensor within the shoe. The system is based on a commercially available transducer and can be readily reproduced for use in a laboratory setting for less than $50. We describe this system, as well as its validation. To assess the accuracy of this footswitch system, we compared footswitch based estimates of initial and end foot contact times with those obtained using a force platform as 10 people took 30 steps (10 each at slow, normal and fast walking rates) across a force platform. Both estimates coincided within +/- 10 ms (mean: 0 +/- 3 ms; N = 300) for the start of stance phase and within +/- 22 ms (mean: -1 +/- 8 ms; N = 300) for the end of stance phase. For stance duration, the differences ranged from -24 to 28 ms (mean: 1 +/- 10 ms; N = 300). In combination, these measures can be used to estimate stance duration to within 3% of force plate determined values for steps with stance durations ranging from 446 to 1594 ms. Estimates of swing and stride duration also are within 5% of force plate determined values. This system should therefore prove to be a useful tool for augmenting laboratory based investigations of gait.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: A 1-year prospective study
Hausdorff, J. M., Rios, D. A., & Edelberg, H. K. (2001) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.24893 · Cited by 2,313
Self-citationZeni, J. A., Richards, J. G., & Higginson, J. S. (2008) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007 · Cited by 1,261
Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning
Hausdorff, J. M. (2005) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-2-19 · Cited by 934
Self-citationHausdorff, J. M. (2007) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.003 · Cited by 868
Self-citationHausdorff, J. M., Mitchell, S. L., Firtion, R., Peng, C. K., Cudkowicz, M. E., Wei, J. Y., & Goldberger, A. L. (1997) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1997.82.1.262 · Cited by 847
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hausdorff, J. M., Ladin, Z., & Wei, J. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-351
- ISSN
- 0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011702367
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Footswitch system for measurement of the temporal parameters of gait. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0021-9290(94)00074-e
- The paper
- Hausdorff, J. M., Ladin, Z., & Wei, J. Y. (1995). Footswitch system for measurement of the temporal parameters of gait. Journal of Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)00074-e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.