The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A practical difference scheme for Fokker-Planck equations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gutenkunst, R. N., Hernandez, R. D., Williamson, S. H., & Bustamante, C. D. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000695 · Cited by 1,906
“We solve the diffusion equation on a regular nonuniform grid, using a finite difference scheme [36] inspired by the method of Chang and Cooper [37] (Text S1).”
MethodElapsed Decision Time Affects the Weighting of Prior Probability in a Perceptual Decision Task
Hanks, T. D., Mazurek, M. E., Kiani, R., Hopp, E., & Shadlen, M. N. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5613-10.2011 · Cited by 378
Stochastic aspects of climatic transitions-Additive fluctuations
NICOLIS, C., & NICOLIS, G. (1981) · Tellus · doi:10.1111/j.2153-3490.1981.tb01746.x · Cited by 280
Gamma-ray binaries: pulsars in disguise?
Dubus, G. (2006) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054779 · Cited by 270
Effects of cortical microstimulation on confidence in a perceptual decision
Fetsch, C. R., Kiani, R., Newsome, W. T., & Shadlen, M. N. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.011 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, J. S., & Cooper, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1970-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0021-9991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976284739
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A practical difference scheme for Fokker-Planck equations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0021-9991(70)90001-x
- The paper
- Chang, J. S., & Cooper, G. (1970). A practical difference scheme for Fokker-Planck equations. Journal of Computational Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(70)90001-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
