Generating quasi-random sequences from semi-random sources
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Any Santha-Vazirani weak source with ε < 0.058 can be amplified into arbitrarily free random bits in a self-testing way using a two-party chained Bell inequality and requiring only no-signalling.
“Using a two-party chained Bell inequality, 71,72 they showed that any Santha -Vazirani weak sources 73 (de fi ned in Methods), with ϵ o 0.058, can be ampli fi ed into arbitrarily free random bits in a self-testing way by requiring only no-signalling.”
From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [73]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 256
- Authors
- Santha, M., & Vazirani, U. V.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Computer and System Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-87
- ISSN
- 0022-0000 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977568210
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Computer and System Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Mathematical Approximation and Integration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
- Keywords
- quasi-random sequences, randomness extraction, pseudorandom number generators, stochastic simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review